European countries sign a new climate agreement
European leaders signed a new climate agreement aimed at reducing pollution faster. Supporters say it can create green jobs, while critics worry about the cost.
Pick your level
Standard — Natural English
42 words · ~1 min readEasy version (A2–B1)
European countries signed a new climate agreement. The plan tries to reduce pollution faster. Some leaders say it will help the environment and create jobs. Other people worry it may cost too much money.Standard version (B1–B2)
European countries have signed a climate agreement that is designed to reduce pollution more quickly. Supporters argue that the policy could create green jobs and speed up the energy transition. Critics, however, say the plan may be expensive for governments and businesses.Advanced version (C1–C2)
European governments signed a new climate agreement intended to accelerate emissions reductions across the region. Backers say the framework could support long-term economic growth through green investment, though opponents remain concerned about the financial burden and implementation costs.Lesson audio
Standard level
Tap to play
Quick quiz
01What did European countries sign?
02What do supporters think the plan could create?
03What is one concern raised by critics?
Key vocabulary
Save the words you want to keep. Saved words come back in your daily reviews so they actually stick.
agreement word
an official decision or plan accepted by two or more sides
“The countries reached an agreement after several months of talks.”
reduce word
to make something smaller or less
“The policy aims to reduce air pollution in large cities.”
pollution word
harmful substances in the air, water, or land
“Pollution can affect both human health and the environment.”
critics word
people who point out problems or express disagreement
“Critics said the proposal would be too expensive.”
burden word
a difficult responsibility, cost, or problem to carry
“Small companies worry about the financial burden of new rules.”
Discussion prompt
Do you think governments should spend more money on climate action, even if some industries face higher costs? Why or why not?